Causes of the Collapse of the Weimar Republic

Causes of the Collapse of the Weimar commonwealthCollapse of the Weimar republicTo what utmost understructure it be said that the enceinte first and the overburdening of the Ger valet de chambre eudaemonia raise were the principal(prenominal) bring ins of the Collapse of the Weimar Republic?When considering the importance and extent to which the with child(p) notion and the overburdening of the German wellbeing state were the main causes of the feed of the Weimar, it is unavoidable to assess other factors which in addition added to its reverse. This essay intends to argue, the heavy(p) Depression and overburdening of the benefit state were prominent reasons in the latter stages of the Weimars divulge, they accelerated its failure in 1929 and by 1932 arguably the Weimar Republic was realistically unworkable. notwithstanding this, the main cause of the expose was the continuous poor frugal state of Ger numerous which hindered the success of major(ip)(ip)ity rule and finally firmness of purposeed in the failure of the Weimar. The legacy of the First populace War, the personal doings of the agreement of Versailles and the 1923 hyper pomposity crisis significantly worsened Ger galore(postnominal)s sparing problems. The Great Depression and the overburdening of the public instigateance state derived from this constant pecuniary strain that the government suffered under and utmostly spiralled the situation off of control which proved unmanageable for the government. This created a edit out back in actualise from those who were in favour of res publica and produced peevishness amongst the radical Right and Left wing party members themselves. Finally, much charge will be given to the Weimars inability to great bridge player with the crisis via unsuccessful conclusion making and the long term traditional attitudes of the elites within the government that were also highly important contributions to the collapse of the Weimar. ac cordingly with detrimental ongoing frugal crisis and contributing semipolitical factors, the Weimar Republic was doomed from the outset1, resulting in its collapse.Arguably the Great Depression and the overburdening of the eudaimonia state played a alert role in the collapse of the Weimar but was not the main reason. The Great Depression was a severe worldwide economic crisis that prayan in the United States with the rampart Street Crash on October 29th, 1929. International bargain, incomes, and profits plummeted. The Depression had wide repercussions on Germ whatever as they relied on loans from America to facilitate their prosperity, pay get by dint of their fixs and revive their economy. Arguably the Depression was prominent in the very last stages of the Weimars deportment as it was not until after 1929, the economic outlook changed from sick to distinctly stormy2. The use of the word gloomy indicates that preliminary to the Depression, Germany was already fight eco nomically and thus this statement adds weight to the notion that the Depression acted as a catalyst to the horizontaltual breakdown of the government. Further more(prenominal), the outburst of the Depression in 1929 had a disastrous impact on the German economy 3 as almost one third of German production was exported by 1920. give upd after this time, exports had rock-bottom. As imports had fallen by two thirds, this had linkage effect on German workers as many lost their jobs between 1929-1933. formalized figures in January in 1928 s overlyd at 1,862,000 unemployed and by 1930 when the Depression had taken real effect in Germany, this increased to 3,218,000.4 These statistics indicate that even in the first place the Depression Germanys unemployment rate was high, thus Germany was in a financial crisis in front the Depression and the Weimars reputation was already on the verge of failure.Although the government try to resolve the problem of unemployment for example, premier Heinrich Brunning who introduced a series of policies to deal with this financial crisis. He cut down wages, salaries and prices in an effort to restore faith in the German financial and industrial system.5 His efforts were unsuccessful and ineffective as subsequent to this by 1931 there were nearly 4.5 million mickle out of work, thus illustrating the Weimars inability to deal with the crisis contributing to its own collapse. This initiated further opposite word and bitterness towarfareds the Republic. Clearly the depression contributed to the Weimars unpopularity and more so its collapse. Additionally most(prenominal) liberal parties, the DVP(Germans People Party) and DDP (German Democrat Party) witnessed a decrease in votes during the 1930 choice as much of their support rested on the middle strain these white collar workers with status, who were monetary advantageous to the average class man felt humiliated, betrayed and angry towards the Weimar government activity.6 Co nsequently faced with insoluble economic problems many peck turned to force and coercion7, (the Nazi party) in hope of a radical solution to their troubles. This strengthens the line of reasoning that economics was central to the collapse of the Weimar, the Depression added the final touches. Furthermore with large firms dependent on USA loans and German banks that also had taken out loans to invest in businesses, when the depression strike it destroyed the relative stability of the financial system and hence put an overwhelming burden on the public assistance state. The welfare States purpose was to provide benefits for the unemployed, pensioners and disabled. In 1927 the welfare state introduced the unemployment restitution Act. By 1929 as a result of the depression it was futile to provide unemployment insurance for the amount of unemployed spate. Arguably these two factors were linked as without the Great Depression the welfare state would not have suffered an overwhelmi ng burden. This is evident as the piece of unemployed supported by the unemployment insurance declined from 80 per cent at the beginning of 1929 ( in fronthand the Depression) to 30 per cent in January 1932 when half-dozen million people were unemployed. The welfare states failure to deliver this unemployment Insurance during this crucial period reflected the flunk of the Weimar system itself. Henig agrees with the c formerlypt that the welfare state played a recognize role in the collapse of the Weimar arguing, fightically this major achievement of the unemployment insurance threatened to engulf the government in a major financial crisis.8 Additionally as people expected a great deal from the welfare state, when these expectations were not met they became sour and anti- democratic.9On the other hand Bookbinder challenges this argument that economic crisis was the main reason to the Weimars failure proclaiming, in times of crisis much(prenominal) as the 1923 hyperinflation, t hese difficulties endangered the order and resilience of the Weimar but did not catch up with the Republics failure inevitable.10 besides one may say the fact that these economic problems persistently occurred, suggests that this was the Weimars governments downfall and resulted in its failure the Great Depression and overburdening of the welfare state were just the last straw.Evidently economic instability was the main reason of the Weimars collapse as the inflation problem was announced before the First World War had ended.11 More so, on top of the prodigious debt incurred from financing the war of around 150 milliard marks, Germany was even more devastated when they standard their reparations bill of 6.600 million pounds.12 With the republic already in social and political ruin, the economic reparations ultimately destroyed the foundations of the Weimar. This proved too much for the Government to handle and by 1922 they declared themselves unable to make payments.13 Additiona lly referable to heavy taxation which, was also an effect of inflation meant students, pensioners and people with savings lost all their notes thus the governments status deteriorated amongst these groups.14 Even more, German agriculture was fiancially tarnished as farmers suffered from the fatiguing effort to supply Germany during the war and by 1920 they were experiencing broken in crop yields and diminished number of livestock.15 Heavy industrial owners were also financially effected as they witnessed a decline in their profits and what is more they were a critical part of the anti- republican bloc and make life difficult for the republic.16 Peukart also h rares economics responsible for the main cause of collapse arguing, these problems hindered the new Republic from guaranteeing their survival.17 Post-war inflation further affected German political parties, for example the liberal parties who struggled to afford paper and stamps by 1920 and suffered extreme financial diffic ulties.18The First World War deteriorated the economic situation in Germany even more, as Weitz argues, the legacy of World War One was the republics greatest obstacle. It hobbled developments at every turn and gave the enemies of democracy aeonian rounds of ammunition.19Bookbinder strengthens this opinion stating, before the war Germany was a strong nation producing 13.1 million tons of pig iron and 13 million tons of steel. Arguably it was there involvement in the war which initiated their national debt and an inflated currency.20 Germanys decision to finance the war through borrowing money instead of increasing taxations accelerated their economic downswing even more , this programme of war financing precipitated the monitory inflation which was to take place through to 1923.21 Subsequently wages increased but for some people this did not match the increase in the cost of their living.22 etiolate collar workers, who in pre war years had great prestige, were now experiencing e conomic hardship due to the war and inflation.23The conformity of Versailles was also a result of the First World War and had disastrous impact on the German economy contributing to the Weimars failure. The government accepted responsibility of the war and sign-language(a) the War Guilt Clause (article 231), this encouraged social unrest in Germany and resentment especially amongst the Right wing nationalists. Mckenzie claims that Versailles presented the Nationalists with a persuasive pretext for mounting the blame of Germanys troubles on the Republic, they felt betrayed and stabbed in the back24. During this time, the fact that the Weimar was a newly established democracy meant it was vulnerable and under threat. It is important to consider that for a newly established democracy to survive, it must have the support of the people in especially in turbulent the most times. nonetheless the Weimar government lacked this assistance as Mommsen notes, German people did not very sup port democracy from the beginning, instead they thinked it as the only possible gist for the new state. 25On the other hand it could be argued that German people were in favour of democracy but lacked the principle foundations of it, as many envisioned a progressive reform of their previous monarch system. neer the less it is give-up the ghost that the Weimar was never whole heartedly supported even before it came into practice. Additionally Right wing groups also attacked democracy mainly because of the write of the Treaty of Versailles, because their members were incredibly exponentful being were highly integrated into the major institutions of state, society, business, civil service, army, universities and churches.26 This highlights a flaw in the Weimar government, because the coalition parties were not coupled with a common goal this was proved difficult to implement policies and deal with opponents. Attacks from the Left wing radicals also endangered democracy. In Janu ary 1919 an attempt was make from the Left wing group, the Spartacuss who attempted to overthrow the government, however this was crushed by the army and the Freikorps. Although the Weimar did survive these attacks, arguably these uprisings only failed not because these opposition groups lacked clear aims and an alternative system. Even more the economic burden created by the Treaty, make continued reforms and tax policies difficult.27 Thus Germany was now economically weaker then previously in 1914 as they had increased national debts, inflated currency and reparation stood at the value of 132 billion marks.28On the other hand Hobsbawm disagrees with the view that the radical Right wing oppositions came about due to the resentment of the Treaty of Versailles and states, The wind of radical Right after the First World War, was doubtless a response to the danger.of social revolution and working class power in general, to the October revolution and Leninism in particular. Without t hese, there would have been no fascism29. Despite this, it is evident that the Right wing movements were an outcome of the First World War. Hyperinflation in 1923 another crucial disaster brought the inflationary situation to its final crisis phase30. The economic effects of the occupation were catastrophic. Kolb also agrees with this opinion describing it as a miracle31 the Weimar survived. moreover, chancellor Stresemann rescued Germany and introduced new currency and borrowed loans from America to facilitate Germanys finances, following on from this it could be argued that the German economy did experience a period of prosperity. save the solution was temporary and one that depended on international loans.32 Again reflecting a grave decision made by the government as having provided a permanent solution, this would have prevented the severity Great Depressions impact on Germany. Stresemann himself depict this period of affluence as dancing on a volcano33 , this exemplifies tha t too was aware that depending on American loans was risky. Still in 1929 when the Depression hit, Germany was once again faced with economic problems. Economic historian Borchhardt believes that even without the fact of the Depression Germanys economy was abnormal and would not have been able to continue in the same way.34This reinforcing the view that economics was the main cause of the collapse of the Weimar.Clearly, the Weimar governments failure to take firm action played a vital role to the collapse of the Weimar. This is particularly evident with invasion of the Ruhr, as previous to this the SPD (Social Democrat Party) had the backing of the working class who were protected from the inflation via trade unions and also the support of large landowners who were able to pay of their debts which if made the good decisions could have excelled on this support. However in 1923 their misguided efforts to print money steered them in to hyperinflation. Hinton and Hite strengthen this argument claiming, although some of the problems were beyond Germanys power to control, the collapse came about due to the Weimars weak policies and lack of decisive action.35 Consequently endless economic disasters became too unmanageable for the government to keep combating, as with any government this repeated economic crises would too inevitably lead to their failure. other equally significant factor which contributed to the collapse of the Weimar Republic, was the traditional attitudes of the ruling elites and a lack of bureaucratic culture. Furthermore because democracy was introduced the most inauspicious circumstances36 , the old elites such as the DVP and the DNVP ( German National Peoples Party) were monarchs at heart and never fully fledged their support to the Republic or the notion of democracy 37 , consequently they wanted a reversion back to the old system. However the KPD (communist party) and the NSDAP (The Nazi Party) was determined to unify the people of Germany. Germany had always been an imperialist country and headed by constitutional monarch, this meant the long term values of democracy were wanting(predicate) in order for the Weimar to be successful. Subsequently by 1930 there was a powerful current of opinion in Germany demanding a more oppressive government.38 The elites could not regard the new republic as a just descendant to the pre-war imperial regime,39 thus if the ruling class were not in favour democracy how was the rest of the country going to support it? The Weimar was unable to accomplish unconditional support of these traditional elites such as the Junkers and army officers.40 Kocka reinforces this notion and believes the failure of the Weimar was due to the bourgeoisie who seemed relatively weak and unbourgeois .41 Consequently with the combination of old and new political forces present in the government, this halted the felicity of democracy.In conclusion it is clear that economics was the foremost reason to why the Weimar collapsed as even before the Great Depression which was followed by the overburdening of the welfare state, Germany was constantly faced with financial constraints that was caused by the damage of the First World War, this meant straight away the Weimar was forced to introduce a new democratic way of life in the most unpromising conditions. Even more, the reparations of the Treaty of Versailles and the exacerbated the governments financial pressures, thus resulting in a decline of support of the Weimar and the rise of radical Right and Left wing parties which threatened democracy. Lastly the major hyper inflation crisis in 1923 meant money completely lost its value, subsequently as demand rapidly decreased many people lost their jobs. However the introduction of a new currency and loans form the America temporarily revitalised their economy. Yet when the depression hit, America could no longer assist them and as Germany had no money of its own to aid its finances, this resul ted in the unemployment of six million people. This placed a overwhelming burden on the welfare state and led to severe poverty as by 1932 people who had worn out their entitlement to state benefit and were thrown on the streets to beg for food.42 The Depression tore apart the fragile political compromise that the Weimar had made via the welfare state and placed an enormous burden on to it. No doubt, the actions of the government themselves contributed to their own downfall as incremental thoughtlessness decisions decreased their popularity and status amongst Germany. Alongside this attribute lies the ruling elites for example the DNVP as their failure to support the vulnerable democratic meant the regime itself lacked confidence. Together these were a vital contribution to the collapse of the Weimar Republic. It is evident t .hat economic hurdles occurred end-to-end the Weimars life and led to abnormalities within the system and eventually its collapse. This concludes me to sugges t that the Weimar Republic itself was the special path that Germany followed (the Sonderweg), as this failed experiment of democracy ultimately caused Germany to trip towards the Nazi regime.BIBLIOGRAPGHYHobsbawm .E, The Age of Extremes 1919-1941 (London 1995)Baldeston .T, The Origins and Course of the German Economic Crisis, (Berlin, 1993)Jones .L, German Liberalism and the looseness of the bowels of the Weimar party system, 1918-1933, (Chapel Hill, 1988),Kocka .J, Asymmetrical diachronic Comparison The case of the German Sonderweg, muniment and theory, 38, (1999), p.40-50Henig. R, The Weimar Republic 1919-1933 (London, 1998)Mckenzie P. R. J,Weimar Germany 1918-1933 (London 1971)Bookbinder . P, Weimar Germany, The Republic of the Reasonable, (Manchester, 1996)Weitz E.D, Weimar Germany insure and Tradgedy, (New Jersey 2007)Hidden .J, The Weimar Republic second Edition (London 1969)Hinton .C and Hite . J , Weimar and Nazi Germany, (London, 2001),Kolb .E The Weimar Republic, Seco nd Edition (New York, 2005)Childs .D, Germany Since 1918, (London 1971)Stachura .D P (ed.), Unemployment and the Great depression in Germany, (London, 1986)Mazower. M, Dark Continent, (London, 1999)Evan. J. R, and Geary D (eds), The German Unemployed, (London, 1987)To what extent can it be said that the Great Depression and the overburdening of the German welfare State were the main causes of the Collapse of the Weimar Republic?1 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.782Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.613 P. Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, The Republic of the Reasonable, (Manchester, 1996), p.1784 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 1745 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 1466 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 1677 E. Hobsbawm, The Age of Extremes,(London, 1995), p.1368 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.609 J. Kocka, Asymmetrical Historical Comparison The case of the German Sonderweg, History and theory, 38, (1999), p 4610 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 16111 J. Hidden, The Weimar Republic 2nd Edition (London 19 69)p.3012 Hidden, The Weimar, p.3013 Hidden, The Weimar, p.3114 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p.16615 Hidden, The Weimar, p. 3416 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 17117 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.8318 L. Jones, German Liberalism and the Dissolution of the Weimar party system, 1918-1933, (Chapel Hill, 1988), p. 165.19 E. D. Weitz, Weimar Germany Promise and Tradgedy, (New Jersey 2007)p.12720 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p.16321 Bookbinder16422 Bookbinder 16423Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p. 16624 J. R. P. Mckenzie,Weimar Germany 1918-1933 (London 1971)p.7125 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.7826 Weitz, Weimar Germany Promise and Tradgedy, p9227 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p.16428 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p.16429 E. Hobsbawm, The Age of Extremes 1919-1941 (London 1995)p.12430 Bookbinder, Weimar Germany, p.16731 E. Kolb, The Weimar Republic, Second Edition, (New York, 2005), p.3532 Hidden, The Weimar, p.3233 C. Hinton and J. Hite, Weimar and Nazi Germany, (London, 2001), p.7434C. Hinton a nd J. Hite, Weimar and Nazi Germany, p.75.35 Hinton and lavatory , Weimar and Nazi Germany, p.103.36 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.7837 Weitz, Weimar Germany Promise and Tradgedy, p.9238 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.6239 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.7940 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.8441 Kocka, Assymetrical Histroical Comparison, p. 4242 Henig, The Weimar Republic, p.67