Attribution theory :: essays research papers

ATTRIBUTION guess OF FRITZ HEIDERIntroductionThis article starts off by a man having his married woman serve on a jury in a federal official case involving conspiracy, racketeering, drug dealing, armed robbery, and extortion. There were seven defendants and one that flee from police custody. The key government witness was an ex-gang member named Larry who was c altogethitherd the Canary by the defendants because he turned informer. For two months denim, the wife, listened to Larrys testimony and tried to mental image out whether his account of the incident was credible or not. A examination in her mind was that whether his behavior on the stand was that of pathological liar, a rejected pal seeking revenge, a petty crook who would assure anything to save his own skin, or and honest witness dedicated to the verity? All this falls into Fritz Heiders attribution theory saying that we all tend to rationalize in the same way. Fritz said that the theory of attribution is the assist of drawing inferences. This would be seeing a person correspond and immediately reaching a conclusion that goes beyond mere sensory(a) information. Example Larry yawns while on the stand. Your immediate conclusive reaction would be is he bored, afraid, tired, or indifferent. In the article it says that Heider would see us as nave psychologist bringing common sense to bear on an interpersonal judgment. It also says that we keistert help it to sop up these judgments. This is because we make personality judgments in order to explain otherwise confusing behavior.Heider says that theres another reason for making causal inferences from behavior. The reason is because we pauperism to know what to expect in the future. He says prediction is a survival of the fittest skill. Example Jean comes face-to-face with one of the defendants, in her jury trail, out of doors a train station. Mildly anxious, she quickly turned aside. Accurate attributions can help us know which people might do us harm.The article also talks about attribution as macrocosm a three-step process through which we perceive others as causal agents. The three-step process talked about includes perception of the action (You saw it), judgment of intention (You/they meant to do that), and attribution of disposition (What you think of the action).AnalysisTo begin, in the case with Jean trying to figure out whether Larrys story was credible and how to reason his behavior. In my opinion I would think him turning informer